To keep you up to speed, Neornithes
developed into Paelognathes (old jaw) and into Neognathes (new jaw). From this
group of birds developed some other specifics, but the two of interest to us are the Chardriiformes
and the Ciconiiformes. Notice that from the Ciconiiformes stem the Pelecaniformes (obviously
containing pelicans), and from the Pelecaniformes stem the Procellariformes, which gave rise
to Graviidae (loons, etc.) and Spheniscidae. There's Spheniscidae, our old friend the
penguin. So, you can see that the auks, which are often mistaken as being closely related to the penguin due to
their similar size, shape and ecological niche, aren't closely related to penguins at all. However, you can
see what are closely related to penguins: the Procellariformes from which penguins descend directly,
and the Graviidae, which is a daughter clade of the Procellariformes with the Spheniscidae.
    A matter of clarification is necessary at this point. When we speak of fossil penguins, we
are referring to the fossil remains of the many species of penguins that have long since vanished from the
earth. Their remains are buried in the deep recesses of the crust of the earth or have been obliterated
completely. Those that remain are our links to the past, and our tools for education regarding penguin
derivation.
   
The first fossil penguin found is today held in the British Museum of
Natural History. This fossil was reportedly found by an anonymous Maori
in New Zealand in the year 1859 and was dubbed Palaeeudyptes
antarcticus despite the fact that the species was located a great
distance from the continent of Antarctica. Since that great discovery,
over the next few years, several more fossils
were found and were dated back to the Miocene and three others from the
Pliocene. Several specimens were dated to the Late Pliocene and
others from the Recent era. According to G.G. Simpson (1975), it is not
clear what distinguishes these fossils from modern day Eudyptula,
the Little blue penguin and its variants.
   
Specimens from Argentina were collected just shy of 1891. Extensive work on
these fossil penguins was provided by Florentino Ameghino, and in 1905, he
published a rather inclusive report that quickly became source material for
the subsequent study of Spheniscus.
G.G. Simpson (1975) provides us with the following table of fossil penguins:
|
Australia
- Palaeeudyptes
- Anthropodyptes gilli
- Pseudaptenodytes macraei
- Pseudaptenodytes minor (questionable)
New Zealand
- Palaeeudyptes marplesi
- Palaeeudyptes (not marplesi)
- Pachydyptes ponderosus
- Palaeeudyptes antarcticus
- Platydyptes marplesi (questionable)
- Archaeospheniscus lowei
- Archaeospheniscus lopdelli
- Duntroonornis parvus
- Platydyptes novaezealandiae
- Platydyptes amiesi
- Korora oliveri
- Marplesornis novaezealandiae
- Pygoscelis tyreei
- Aptenodytes ridgeni
|
South America
- Palaeospheniscus gracilis
- Palaeospheniscus bergi
- Palaeospheniscus patagonicus
- Palaeospheniscus wimani
- Chubutodyptes biloculata
- Paraptenodytes antarticus
- Paraptenodytes robustus
- Paraptenodytes brodkorbi (questionable)
- Arthrodytes grandis
Seymour Island
- Anthropornis nordenskjoeldii
- Anthropornis grandis
- Palaeeudyptes gunnari
- Wimanornis seymourensis
- Archaeospheniscus wimani
- Delphinornis larsenii
South Africa
|
    The chart above is certainly not exhaustive; there may be many
more undiscovered extinct penguins, or extinct penguins that may never be
discovered. However, it is evident from the above that at least three of
modern penguins (genera: Aptenodytes, Spheniscus, and
Pygoscelis) went extinct "recently." By recently, I mean within the
last 4-5 million years. The remainder of the penguins stem from 5 to 40
million years ago, basically back to the time currently recorded as when
penguins diverged from other modern birds. Research testing suggests
that the tallest of these penguins were probably around 6 feet tall.
   
The consensus is that penguins did indeed originate from an ancestor that
flew some 40 million years ago, quite possibly from the order Procellariformes,
as I have already demonstrated. What then caused the
present (and past penguins) to lose their capability to fly? A few
explanations have arisen. One of these theories is known as "systemic
mutation" (Goldschmidt), also known as "typostrophism" (Schindewolf).
This account is unlikely since radical changes (flight to no flight) can
occur on a small evolutionary scale without the requirement of extensive
mutations occurring at once. Nevertheless, the inability to fly is still
seen as a viable adaptation, since radical changes that are not
adaptations typically lead to extinction. We have already given two possible
theories as to how birds acquired flight. Now we have discussed how penguins
may have lost that ability to fly.
   
Regardless of the adaptations, penguins are southern birds, with only one
"tropical" species - the Galapagos penguin (Spheniscus
mendiculus). The fossil remains of penguins do not stem far from
these southern localities, so it is generally assumed that they came onto
the evolutionary scene from these areas. This fact leaves a bit of a
mystery to be solved. The earliest avian fossil found in the southern
hemisphere is said to have existed in the Eocene age (a period of the
Paleogene era of the Cenozoic period -- about 38 to 54 million years ago);
Simpson claims this
species has "nothing to do with penguins." Hence, the likely suggestion
is that the "continental drift" theory accounts for the apparent arrival
of flightless species in such remote parts of the world as Antarctica.
    Decent play has been given to the notion that the land mass
of the Earth was at one time unified. This land mass was known as Pangaea.
Approximately 135 million years ago, Pangaea split into Laurasia and Gondwana.
Gondwana contained present day South America, Africa, Antarctica, India and Australia.
There was sufficient unity among the regions of Gondwana for birds to develop
throughout this region before it split into land masses recognizable by today's
geographical standards; this occurred around the end of the Cretaceous period.
The heavy tectonic activity may account for some of the spread and speciation
of modern penguins.
   
Like their modern day descendants, fossil penguins were inshore
animals.
One of the most affluent sources of fossil penguins happens to be the
basal beds of the Chubut River in Patagonia. This area is obviously
closely associated with the sea.
   
The only exception to this generality has been Spheniscus
predemersus, which has been found amongst other terrestrial fauna
(Hendey, 1970). Ironically, these fossils were found quite near to
certain seal fossils, so it is highly probable that S. predemersus
was an inshore animal as well.
   
It is widely agreed that earlier penguins were more diverse and
much
larger than present day species. Simpson claims that these fossil
penguins quite extensively populated the Cenozoic era and were the
dominant predators of small crustaceans throughout this time, long before
seals and their relatives appeared.
   
Simpson also assumes that these penguin relatives were "adapted to
markedly higher environmental temperatures than the majority of recent
penguins." The logical conclusion from this assumption is that modern ψ
day penguins carry more equipment that enables them to survive in the
colder temperatures, such as more fat reserves, smaller surface areas and
less exposed skin. (Again, as one moves further south, penguins become
larger - less surface area to volume - and less of the skin is exposed
to the environment, e.g. Humboldts compared to Adelies.)
This concludes the Natural Evolution section.
Darwin, Charles. On Evolution. Glick & Kohn, eds. 1996. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.: Indianapolis.
Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. 1991. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Simpson, G.G., 1975. Fossil Penguins.in Stonehouse,The Biology of Penguins.
Young, David. 1992. The Discovery of Evolution. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
| |